Stop Global Warming

Surprise: Most Coal Ash Ponds Not Regulated

Published January 06, 2009 @ 06:32PM PT

Continuing my morning's theme of the billion-gallon coal sludge spill in Tennessee:  

It turns out that the Environmental Protection Agency does not regulate any of the nation's 1,300+  coal ash ponds, or maintain watch on their effects on the nearby environment, even though they contain billions of gallons of sludge containing heavy metals like arsenic, lead, mercury and selenium, which the agency identifies as threats to human health and to water supplies. Instead, they are managed by a patchwork of state regulations -- and some states have none.

Amazing.

“Your household garbage is managed much more consistently” than coal combustion waste, Dr. Thomas A. Burke, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told reporter Shaila Dewan of The New York Times. “It’s such a large volume of waste, and it’s so essential to the country’s energy supply; it’s basically been a loophole in the country’s waste management strategy.”

EPA has been studying the issue for 28 years, but has never released any regulations, because of pressure from industry:

In 2000, the agency came close to designating coal ash a hazardous waste, but backpedaled in the face of an industry campaign that argued that tighter controls would cost it $5 billion a year. (In 2007, the Department of Energy estimated that it would cost $11 billion a year.) At the time, the E.P.A. said it would issue national regulations governing the disposal of coal ash as a nonhazardous waste, but it has not done so.

“We’re still working on coming up with those standards,” said Matthew Hale, director of the office of solid waste at the E.P.A. “We don’t have a schedule at this point.”

Share this Post

Related Posts

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Emily Gertz

Emily is a journalist and editor covering the environment and science, and has been working in online news, community and content since 1994.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.