Obama Admin. Approves California's Tailpipe Emissions Rule
Published June 30, 2009 @ 08:29PM PT
After five years of uncertainty, California has gotten the green light to set tougher standards for greenhouse gas pollution from automobiles than those set by the federal government.
The Environmental Protection Agency announced this afternoon that it would grant the "California waiver" to federal fuel economy standards. This clears the road for the Golden State to implement immediately a 2002 state law requiring new cars and trucks to raise fuel economy 40 percent, to an average of 35.5 miles per gallon, by 2016.
President Obama wants the same standard nationwide by 2016, four years sooner than Congress mandated as part of a 2007 energy law.
"This decision puts the law and science first," EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a statement. "After review of the scientific findings, and another comprehensive round of public engagement, I have decided this is the appropriate course under the law."
Jackson was very likely zinging her Bush-appointed predecessor, Stephen Johnson, for breaking with traditional interpretations of the use of the Clean Air Act, as well as the agency's history of granting the waiver, when he denied California the right to implement its law in 2008.
Jackson's approval of the waiver isn't surprising, but the impact is significant: it overturns one of the Bush administration major roadblocks for states in combatting global warming. Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington, as well as the District of Colombia, all intend to apply California's standard.
Writing in The New York Times "Wheels" blog, Jim Motavalli reports that automakers appear to have collectively shrugged their shoulders at the announcement:
“This issue was largely decided when the Obama administration announced a single national program,” said Charles Territo, a spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. “Last month’s agreement settled the question of who would set future fuel economy and greenhouse-gas standards.”
It's good news that the California waiver has been granted. Now the question is why a mere 35.5 mpg seven years from now is the goal. Technologies already exist on the global automobile market -- like Toyota's third-gen Prius hybrid -- that get 50 miles per gallon or more.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
What Is a Green-Collar Job?
-
Fatalistic Friday: 'Cash for Clunkers' could save 16 mpg Hummer
-
Suggest a story to Stop Global Warming
Comments (2)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















"It's good news that the California waiver has been granted. Now the question is why a mere 35.5 mpg seven years from now is the goal. Technologies already exist on the global automobile market -- likeToyota's third-gen Prius hybrid -- that get 50 miles per gallon or more."
I agree. It's as if they push for the lowest goal that they think would be agreeable.
I can't afford a Prius. I wish GM would bring back the 3 cylinder Geo Metro that got me 58 MPG. It was inexpensive, had good pickup, and was fun to drive. It actually held a lot, too. I was able to fit two kid's bikes in it, along with the kids, amazingly enough. It got better mileage than the Smart Car does (in this country anyway, apparently because of our requirements that end up lowering gas mileage).
I want an affordable air car. And I wish the US automakers would think about making them.
http://zeropollutionmotors.us/
http://www.mdi.lu/english/
Posted by Sue G. on 07/01/2009 @ 09:16AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sue, have You tried Suzuki? I haven't, but they are the ones who made the Geo, perhaps They make a 3 cylinder.
Posted by Charlie Reed on 07/01/2009 @ 12:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.