Stop Global Warming

Fatalistic Friday: Glaciers shrink, coal lobby spends, more

Published August 07, 2009 @ 06:03PM PT

Retreat of South Cascade Glacier, Washington, during the 20th Century and the beginning of the 21st Century. Source: USGS
Retreat of South Cascade Glacier, Washington, during the 20th Century and the beginning of the 21st Century. Source: U.S. Geological Survey

Scientists See Alaska, Washington Glaciers Shrinking Fast: Three major glaciers in Alaska and Washington state have thinned and shrunk dramatically, clear signs of a warming climate and signaling lower stream flows in summer months, according to a study released Thursday by the U.S. Geological Survey. (Associated Press)

Coal's biggest lobbying group is launching a $1 million campaign to win support from Senate Democrats, an effort that employs the same public relations firm ensnared by a scandal over forged letters to Congress. (Greenwire)

Climate Action May Stall in Fall: With the fight over health care reform absorbing all attention on Capitol Hill, Democrats fear climate change legislation may lose momentum. (Politico)

Realtors Get Labels Cut From Climate Bill for Older Houses: Real estate industry gets older homes exempted from energy labeling provision of energy and climate legislation, saying it threatened a lucrative corner of their industry. (Climatewire)

The Trouble With Nuclear Fuel: Nukes represent a promising bridge from fossil fuels to truly clean energy technologies. But it's really hard to prevent it from being used to make bombs. (The Economist)

Some California Amphibians May Need a Lift to Survive Climate Change:
As amphibian habitat shifts with global warming, some species will be trapped in shrinking territories, and need human interventions to survive. (Scientific American)

"Serious" Climate Talks Hinge On U.S. Bill: The success or failure of international climate treaty talks depends upon the U.S. passing a strong bill to slash carbon pollution, says American Clean Energy and Security Act co-sponsor Edward Markey (D-Mass.) (Reuters)

Tiny Prairie Grouse Native To Wind-Rich Swath Of America: If the lesser prairie chicken is listed as threatened or endangered – the species' numbers have dropped 80 percent nationally since 1963 – significant restrictions would be placed on companies hoping to plant towering turbines across a five-state region believed to have some of the nation's best wind energy potential. (The Dallas Morning News)

Climate Bill Demands Pile Up for Boxer, Kerry Headed Into Summer Break: "Liberal Democrats, for example, want stronger emission targets compared with the House-passed bill. Coal-state senators are pressing for changes to a delicately crafted House deal that would send their electric utilities a larger share of free allocations. And expanded energy production sits atop the wish list for oil patch Democrats." (Climatewire)

Nobel Halo Fades Fast for Climate Change Panel: As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gears up for its next climate review, many specialists in climate science and policy, both inside and out of the network, are warning that it could quickly lose relevance unless it adjusts its methods and focus. (The New York Times)

Share this Post

Related Posts

Comments (3)

  1. jack bradin

     

     

    These are talking points that groups are signing on to take to Senator Boxer:

    The Senate bill must set an economy wide cap on greenhouse emissions that is consistent with the best available science and that can be ratcheted down as necessary. 

    Findings from the U.S. Global Change Research Center,

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and many other institutions and scientists indicate that the atmospheric greenhouse gas stabilization target of 450 parts per million CO2eq is far too high to avoid the risk of catastrophic climate change. Leading scientists currently warn that CO2 mustbe reduced to no more than 350 parts per million.  

    Yet the cap set by H.R. 2454 is insufficient even to achieve 450 parts per million CO2eq. 

    The Senate bill must contain reduction targets consistent with the best available science, representing the U.S. fair global share of reductions within the world's remaining carbon budget, and must include immediate action on short-lived global warming pollutants including black carbon and methane to slow warming in the near term.


    The Clean Air Act already provides many of the necessary tools to reduce greenhouse pollutants. Therefore, the Clean Air Act rollbacks in H.R. 2454, which would actually reduce existing pollution control requirements, facilitate the construction of additional coal fired power plants, and grandfather in unnecessary pollution from existing plants, must be removed.

    The critical safety net of the Clean Air Act must be retained, not discarded in favor of a new, untested system, placing all of our eggs in one precarious basket. Existing Clean Air Act authority should be strengthened by adding deadlines for the oldest and dirtiest coal fired power plants to meet pollution reduction requirements or shut down.

    The Senate bill should eliminate the many loopholes in HR2454 and ensure the integrity of the pollution reduction system. A top priority must be to eliminate or greatly limit and restrict offsets, which allow actual
    pollution from capped sources to increase, creating localized toxic hotspots in people of color and vulnerable communities delay a shift to low carbon technologies in the United States, and increase the risks in carbon markets.
    In addition, the House provision prohibiting a full life-cycle analysis of bio-fuels must be reversed.

    The Senate bill should protect low and middle-income families.  Regardless of the chosen mechanism, the setting of carbon prices must be transparent, stable, and predictable, while minimizing the ability of private entities to
    manipulate the carbon price. We do not believe the market mechanisms contained in the current cap and trade proposal achieve this. The Senate bill should ensure there are adequate protections from climate change for
    low-income families, vulnerable communities domestically and globally, Native American and Indigenous peoples including protections and dividends for low-income consumers and adequate international finance for adaptation.

    The Senate bill should provide for abundant clean energy.  The Senate bill should provide mandates and incentives for abundant clean energy sources
    such as low-impact solar, wind, and non-dam hydro, which do not add toxic burdens to communities and workers, and do not require incineration technologies.

    The Senate bill should eliminate polluter giveaways, including massive subsidies to coal and oil.  Scarce government funding should not go to dangerous fossil fuel or nuclear industries or allow damaging practices such
    as mountaintop removal mining. Instead, public money should go to investments in energy efficiency, renewable energy and the creation of green jobs.

    The Senate bill should live up to the United States' international obligations. For a fair global deal with meaningful global emissions reductions, the United States must both deeply reduce emissions domestically
    and provide adequate international climate finance for clean technology, adaptation, and support a stop to deforestation. Fulfilling these commitments will be essential to securing an effective international agreement.

    We recognize the massive political effort that is necessary to pass climate legislation, but a bill with inadequate targets, loophole-ridden mechanisms, rollbacks of our flagship environmental laws, and inadequate financing for
    developing countries to address climate change will move us in the wrong direction. We urge you to pass a strong climate bill consistent with the principles outlined above. 

    Thank you.

    Sincerely,


    350.org
    Acterra
    Alameda Creek Alliance
    Carolinas Clean Air Coalition
    Center for Biological Diversity
    Church World Service
    Conservation Northwest
    Corporate Ethics International
    Friends Committee on National Legislation
    Friends of the Earth
    Global Exchange
    Great Old Broads for Wilderness
    Green Delaware
    Greenpeace
    Gulf Restoration Network
    Indigenous Environmental Network
    International Rivers
    Kids vs Global Warming
    NC WARN: North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network
    No Impact Project
    Rainforest Action Network
    Sustainable Energy & Economy Network
    Sustainable Futures
    Turtle Island Restoration Network
    Wildlife Center of Virginia







    Cc: Members of the Senate and President Barack Obama

     

    Posted by jack bradin on 08/09/2009 @ 10:02AM PT

  2. Mark O

    There's two sides to the story of melting glaciers:

    http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/008200908090931.htm

    Posted by Mark O on 08/10/2009 @ 09:59AM PT

  3. Emily Gertz

    If they're really on to something, that's great, since it might mean that those glaciers might recover before the end of the century and millions of people will not be going without fresh water.

    I really can't say for sure, unless I read their study, see how they collected and analyzed their data, and learn a little more about local conditions relevant to these glaciers.

    But there are some fairly obvious signs of crapola research in that item (it reads a lot like a press release, in fact).  

    For instance, they say they've found some important evidence on a geological time scale to back up their hypothesis.  But that's not the time scale at issue. Global warming is happening at a much more accelerated rate, a geological nanosecond.

    "Ganjoo said that the east part of the Siachen glacier showed faster withdrawal of the snout that is essentially due to ice-calving, a phenomenon that holds true for almost all major glaciers in the Himalayas and occurs irrespective of global warming."

    So the next question is: What is the rate of calving in the past several decades compared to those before it?  If it's speeded up, or grown in scale, and that's caused the glacier to retreat, why now? 

    Or if it has remained the same, why is the glacier more sensitive to it now than in decades prior?

    "The west part of the Siachen has reduced due to the action of melting water released from the retreated tributary glacier, he said."

    Okay, assuming that meltwater has always be part of the local conditions: Why is that ice melting into water now at a pace sufficient to shrink the glacier?  Why is that tributary glacier retreating, now, to the point that it's affecting the larger glacier?

    It's tempting to grasp at straws to disprove the reality of global warming, since it's a pretty unpleasant reality, but it's important to read these sorts of things critically; recognize that for every one paper like this, there are usually dozens that disprove them; and also remember that a researcher hungry for attention gets a lot more of it for challenging global warming, however speciously, than adding to the body of knowledge that supports our understanding of global warming.

    Posted by Emily Gertz on 08/10/2009 @ 10:37AM PT

  4. Reply to thread

Add a Comment

For your comment to be published, you will need to confirm your email address after submitting your comment.

If you already have an account, click here to log in.

Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Author

Twitter Feed

Emily Gertz

Emily is a journalist and editor covering the environment and science, and has been working in online news, community and content since 1994.

close

This user's Profile page is not public. They have restricted it to only their friends.

Already a Member?

Create an Account

You must create a Change.org account to complete this action.
If you already have an account click here.